Del Martin, one half of the first couple to be married in San Francisco after gay marriage was legalized, died today.
This is one of my favorite songs from one of my favorite movies from when I was a kid. This song is from the movie Sholay, arguably the biggest Bollywood hit in history. My parents had the song on tapes and I think maybe even an LP. It’s one of those songs that just is permanently part of my life’s soundtrack. And, it’s such a good song too. Some more background about the movie from Wikipedia:
Sholay is the highest grossing film of all time in India. It has earned Rs. 2,36,45,00,000, equivalent to US$ 60 million, after adjusting for inflation. When first released, the film was declared a commercial disaster. Word of mouth convinced movie-goers to give the film a chance and soon it became a box-office phenomenon. It ran for 286 weeks straight (more than five years) in one Mumbai theatre, the Minerva. Sholay racked up a still record 60 golden jubilees across India and doubled its original gross over reruns during the late 1970s, 1980s, 1990s and early 2000s. Sholay was the first film in the history of Indian cinema to celebrate silver jubilee (25 weeks) at over a hundred theatres across India.
In 1999, BBC India declared it the “Film of the Millennium”; Indiatimes movies ranks the movie amongst the Top 25 Must See Bollywood Films. In that same year, the judges of the 50th annual Filmfare awards awarded it with a special award called Filmfare Best Film of 50 Years.
Bollywood films, especially from that era, always feel campy to me, but I think I might have to give this another viewing soon.
Bonus video from the 1965 film Gumnaam. This song, Jaan Pehechan Ho, also appeared in the movie Ghost World (which, if I’m remembering correctly, is the first movie my wife and I watched together):
We always wonder if her neck hurt after shooting finished…
(PS. I’m actually reasonably impressed that I can translate much of both songs without looking up words… considering my parents don’t speak Hindi in the house (we’re Gujarati), I think that’s an accomplishment)
Wow, the Post is running a daily box every day with Twitter tweets from folks at the convention. I’m not sure if I should be appalled or impressed. Both?
Key point in this piece, analyzing the op-ed in today’s WSJ (which I haven’t read yet) is this:
John McCain is making it quite clear what his foreign policy will be like: tilting sharply away from the greater realism of Bush’s second term toward the abstract moralism, fear-mongering and aggression of the first. Not just four more years - but four more years like Bush’s first term.
Found via TPM.
Does McCain support equal pay for equal work? Only if you don’t actually allow employees to sue when discrimination happens (in other words, “No”).
Update: Fixed… silly mistake.
I realize that this is heresy, but it’s time that papers drop AP’s political coverage (or at least any piece bylined by Fournier). It’s becoming pretty obvious that the AP’s political editor Ron Fournier has a dog in this race and isn’t just reporting the straight news (with or without extra commentary). His latest piece covering Clinton’s speech is pretty transparently lifting from Republican attacks on Obama:
From there, Fournier recites the very quotes from the Democratic primaries that the McCain campaign has been pushing desperately all week. So, to hear the AP’s Washington bureau chief tell it, the most important takeaway from Clinton’s stirring speech at the convention is the criticism she directed at Obama as far back as nine months ago. And this, coincidentally, just happens to be what Republicans want to see emphasized this week more than anything else.
Reading the Fournier piece shows that it’s entirely filled with speculation about Clinton’s motives and deepest desires, things Fournier can’t know because he actually hasn’t done any reporting. He’s interviewed no one, quotes no one, and does his psychoanalysis from afar. It’s embarrassing.
More importantly, he’s doing AP customers/members and their readers a disservice. These biases aren’t ideological but purely partisan and thus are completely useless to readers who want political news. In an ideal world, when choosing between a Republican and a Democrat, I don’t need to hear from someone who supports the Democrat and someone who supports the Republican, but from people who share goals I’m interested in (e.g. ending dependence on foreign oil, ending the war, preventing abortions, etc.) and then hearing how they measure the candidates among those goals.
Even in a color piece like this that’s supposed to give context to the events at the convention, Fournier should resist the temptation to add in sheer speculation about the motivations of people unless he has some mind reading device he hasn’t told the rest of us about. He’s literally making stuff up, which is pretty bad reporting.
I’m going to write more about this soon, but go read Benen’s piece at The Washington Monthly. He covers the ground on Fournier’s issues. Even mainstream outlets are starting to see some issues with Fournier’s reporting. What’s worse is that he’s in charge of their political reporting, so his hand is in a lot of the political coverage coming out of the AP.
Which brings me back to the headline of this piece.
He’s been on Leno 13 times. Obama has been on once. Not that this stuff matters to me, but it clearly matters to the McCain campaign, so it’s worth pointing out the hypocrisy when McCain claims Obama is the “celebrity” candidate.
And, yes, he defended owning so many houses by pointing out that when he was a POW, he didn’t have a kitchen or floors or a house, just his cell. I can’t believe how much he’s cheapened that very serious experience in his life. It’s now his all purpose defense for any criticism…
One of the things I love about Coolspotters is that it’s pretty easy to quickly create pages for people or products that give people a quick background on a celebrity’s tastes and personal story. In one way, it’s a research tool where you can record the things you read about people in the public eye so that someone else can benefit from that too.
I’m also a political news nut on top of being a music and TV geek (or at least, music and TV geek wanna be). With the political conventions upon us, I know we’re going to see a lot of people in the news that I want to know more about. I’m sure I’m not alone. For example, I didn’t know much about Craig Robinson, Michelle Obama’s brother, so I started filling his profile out. (I didn’t know how much her brother has accomplished, by the way.)
If you see anything interesting about the convention speakers, including video, photos, or links (we call this “media” for simplicity), I’d appreciate it if you could add them to the 2008 Democratic National Convention profile on Coolspotters. Add the people, sponsors, etc. as spots to that profile. I’m a fan of the 2008 DNC profile, so I’ll see any spots or any media you add in my news feed. If you become a fan of that profile, too, you’ll see any media I or others add in your feed.
Keep in mind that this is Coolspotters and not a news site, so I’m interested in the personal stories of these folks, not the straight news. If you read anything interesting, like their musical tastes, any sports they played in high school or college, or any charities they work with, for example, add them as spots. Anything you find cool, add it.
Just go to the 2008 DNC page at Coolspotters and start adding spots to the profile. If we don’t have a page for the folks, sponsors, or other things you’re entering, the site will guide you through a simple process to create a page for them.
Adding media to profiles is also really easy. You can find a link on the left of every profile page that says “Add” (see the image below):
Click the word “Add” and it will walk you through adding web pages, videos, or photos to the profiles. That link is on Spot pages as well, though on the right as blue link.
We’ll be doing the same thing for the 2008 Republican National Convention speakers too, so feel free to add those. The same idea applies to any other celebrity or product you love. That’s the essence of the Coolspotters community, after all. We’re trying to create a place where people share info about the celebrities, products, and things they love.
If you have any questions, feel free to send me a message.
Thanks for helping out!
(crossposted at the Coolspotters blog)
This is the word graph from her speech at the convention. Pretty cool. (via Evan Weaver’s Twitter feed)
Why is she doing this? It’s sort of odd that she’s going. She’s not First Lady, and she doesn’t have any particular expertise or demonstrated interest in the area. So, who’s she meeting with? What’s she going to say? It’s an odd choice…
This is a behind-the-scenes clip and message from Michelle Obama. She’s speaking tonight at 10:30 PM ET from the convention. I’m looking forward to this speech.
By the way, if the talking heads on the news networks are bugging you as much as they bug me, I strongly recommend watching the convention via the online stream. You can get to it at the Democratic Convention site. It’s worth installing the plugins. The technology used here is Move Networks’ very cool streaming video solution. It’s used by ABC for their online episode viewer. While at ESPN, I got a look a rundown of how it works from the EVP in charge of ABC’s online and technology businesses. This stuff is cool, clever, amazing. When the bandwidth is there, it’s been as clear as the HDTV downstairs even running full screen.
I have been ignoring this when the regular press has been covering this story, but Trippi is not quite that.
This is unfortunate, and it’s amazingly selfish. This is the biggest election for all Americans in our lifetime. Period. To risk losing the election and electing McCain would be a disaster for the nation, and it’s unfortunate that these people can’t see past their petty BS and get behind the candidate their party has chosen. Obama and Clinton agree on nearly every major policy goal, they just differed on details. McCain and Clinton agree on nearly 0 policy goals. It’s that simple.
Even more ridiculous is that these folks think voting for McCain will somehow make the feel better. If he wins, I guarantee that anyone who would support Clinton will be kicking themselves come 2010. Just remember all those smug “independents” and other folks who voted for Bush because Kerry was too elitist/rich/commended/unpatriotic/other-republican-made-up-smear when they finally came around in 2006 about GWB. It doesn’t sound like fun to be one of those people, especially when it requires setting up the country to go to more wars and drive even more money out of the hands of regular American families.
Panel including friend of the blog, Amy Bergquist, and other local bloggers talking about the state of Hartford and what can be done to improve it’s image and quality of life.
I’m mentioned to both Kerri and Amy that they were great, but Ken Krayeske just struck me as a bit too intense for the format. I don’t necessarily disagree with a lot of what he said, just didn’t like his delivery.
Regardless, I learned a few things from all three about the city that’s walking distance away from my house (a longish walk, these days, but not when I lived on South Highland).
Very, very tempting. And, since Heidi claims she no longer reads my blog regularly, I can probably buy it, blog about it, and she doesn’t even need to know!
(Expecting a call from Heidi in 10… 9… 8…
)
Here’s the link to the $100 off Kindle Offer. Maybe someone else wants one.
There is a catch, which is that you’ll need to get an Amazon credit card. I really don’t want another credit card, so I guess no Kindle for me.






